<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="lyceum/1.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: fundamental</title>
	<link>http://blogs.olsen.ch/jbg/2007/03/28/fundamental/</link>
	<description>just another webnode...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://lyceum.ibiblio.org/?v=1.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: jbg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; laws of nature</title>
		<link>http://blogs.olsen.ch/jbg/2007/03/28/fundamental/#comment-1651</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.olsen.ch/jbg/2007/03/28/fundamental/#comment-1651</guid>
					<description>[...] See also this post: funadamental, invariant thinking. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] See also this post: funadamental, invariant thinking. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jbg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; in a nutshell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.olsen.ch/jbg/2007/03/28/fundamental/#comment-1650</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.olsen.ch/jbg/2007/03/28/fundamental/#comment-1650</guid>
					<description>[...] fundamental and complex [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] fundamental and complex [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jbg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; what can we know?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.olsen.ch/jbg/2007/03/28/fundamental/#comment-1643</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.olsen.ch/jbg/2007/03/28/fundamental/#comment-1643</guid>
					<description>[...] Recall from fundamental that there are two surprising facts to be found. On the one hand, the physical laws dictating the fundamental behavior of the universe can be mirrored by formal thought systems devised by the mind. And on the other hand, real complex behavior can be emulated by computer simulations following simple laws (the computers themselves are an example of technological advances made possible by the successfull modelling of nature by formal thought systems). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Recall from fundamental that there are two surprising facts to be found. On the one hand, the physical laws dictating the fundamental behavior of the universe can be mirrored by formal thought systems devised by the mind. And on the other hand, real complex behavior can be emulated by computer simulations following simple laws (the computers themselves are an example of technological advances made possible by the successfull modelling of nature by formal thought systems). [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jbg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; complex networks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.olsen.ch/jbg/2007/03/28/fundamental/#comment-1577</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 14:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.olsen.ch/jbg/2007/03/28/fundamental/#comment-1577</guid>
					<description>[...] The new paradigm states that it is best to understand a complex system, if it is mapped to a network. I.e., the links represent the some kind of interaction and the nodes are stripped of any intrinsic quality. So, as an example, you can forget about the complexity of the individual bird, if you model the flocks swarming behavior. (See these older posts: complex, fundamental, swarm theory, in a nutshell.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The new paradigm states that it is best to understand a complex system, if it is mapped to a network. I.e., the links represent the some kind of interaction and the nodes are stripped of any intrinsic quality. So, as an example, you can forget about the complexity of the individual bird, if you model the flocks swarming behavior. (See these older posts: complex, fundamental, swarm theory, in a nutshell.) [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
